Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
10.73k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
18.15k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.99k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.89k (x0.57)
TOTAL
44.15k
36.77k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
20.11k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
36.87k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
10.74k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
3.31k (x0.62)
TOTAL
81.79k
71.02k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4