Core i5-10210Y vs A12 9720P
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9720P is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 9720P gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.3 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 9720P gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.3 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
660f51
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA FP4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
28.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
65.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
10.13k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
13.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
2.9k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
1.94k (x0.29)
TOTAL
44.15k
28.37k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
26.79k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
27.87k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
8.23k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
2.37k (x0.45)
TOTAL
81.79k
65.26k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
1786 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
1858 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
548 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
158 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4351 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
805 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
538 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
7880 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4