Core i5-10210Y vs i3-1115G4
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
7 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
24.25k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
21.63k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
9.09k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
7.23k (x1.07)
TOTAL
44.15k
62.19k (x1.41)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
56.9k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
55.68k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
19.29k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
6.09k (x1.15)
TOTAL
81.79k
137.96k (x1.69)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4