Core i3-8100 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 200.4 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
a40f41
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2017
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8100
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
24.47k
24.35k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.52k
26.85k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.95k
11.82k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
24.18k (x2.93)
TOTAL
59.18k
87.21k (x1.47)
Multithread
i3-8100
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
92.86k
152.84k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
83.05k
208.12k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.55k
88.84k (x4.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.93k
12.57k (x2.12)
TOTAL
200.4k
462.36k (x2.31)
Performance/W
i3-8100
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1429 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1278 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
3083 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6797 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5977 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
16438 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4