Core i3-8100 vs FX 8320E
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 8320E is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the 8320E. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 157.6 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.7 times faster than the 8320E. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
600f20
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8142 kB
Date
October 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
26.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
94.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-8100
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
13.52k
9.23k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
7.95k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.96k
3.41k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.91k
6k (x0.76)
TOTAL
46.96k
26.58k (x0.57)
Multithread
i3-8100
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
53.4k
35.09k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
80.87k
36k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.03k
18.54k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
5.36k (x1.25)
TOTAL
157.59k
94.99k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i3-8100
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
822 points/W
369 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1244 points/W
379 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
293 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
66 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2425 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
2306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5714 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
854 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2196 points/GHz
1499 points/GHz
TOTAL
13044 points/GHz
6646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4