Core i3-7100U vs i5-10210Y
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-Y
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
81.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
17.9k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
15.89k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3.58k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
6.78k (x2)
TOTAL
33.38k
44.15k (x1.32)
Multithread
i3-7100U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
33.78k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
34.63k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
8.09k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
5.29k (x1.57)
TOTAL
79.6k
81.79k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
11684 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4