Core i7-7020U vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the N5105 gets 71.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the N5105 gets 71.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
27.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
71.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7020U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.18k
9.87k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
11.67k
9.75k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.76k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.68k
4.16k (x0.89)
TOTAL
27.5k
27.55k (x1)
Multithread
i7-7020U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
17.51k
28.01k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
27.61k
27.15k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
10.36k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
5.53k (x1.16)
TOTAL
57.3k
71.05k (x1.24)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
2801 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1841 points/W
2715 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
493 points/W
1036 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
553 points/W
TOTAL
3820 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3405 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5073 points/GHz
3362 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1293 points/GHz
1297 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2034 points/GHz
1435 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
9499 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4