| | | | | | |

Core i7-7020U vs A12 9720P


Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9720P is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 9720P gets 65.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.1 times faster than the 9720P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
660f51
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2018
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
28.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
65.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
10.13k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
13.41k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.9k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
1.94k (x0.5)
TOTAL
33.63k
28.37k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-7020U

9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
26.79k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
27.87k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
8.23k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.37k (x0.6)
TOTAL
73.15k
65.26k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-7020U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
1786 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
1858 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
548 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
158 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
4351 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
9720P
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
805 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
538 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
7880 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4