Core i3-6100T vs Celeron J3455
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the J3455 gets 29.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the J3455 gets 29.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
506c9
Core
Skylake-S
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2015
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
13.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
47.36k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.71k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
3.08k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
1.97k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.15k (x0.97)
TOTAL
21.55k
8.91k (x0.41)
Multithread
i3-6100T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
6.4k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
11.59k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
7.23k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
4.39k (x1.58)
TOTAL
50.49k
29.61k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
640 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
723 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
439 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
2961 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1340 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
856 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
935 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
3874 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4