Core i3-6100T vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5900HS gets 431.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5900HS gets 431.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2015
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
77.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
431.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
19.54k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
23.8k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
10.82k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
22.98k (x6.63)
TOTAL
43.92k
77.15k (x1.76)
Multithread
i3-6100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
144.64k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
196.86k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
84.22k (x8.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
5.84k (x1.52)
TOTAL
105.21k
431.56k (x4.1)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
4132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
5625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
2406 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
167 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
12330 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
4248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
2352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
16771 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4