Core i3-6100 vs i5-3340M
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 60.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 94.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 60.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
51 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
30.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
60.79k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.78k
11.29k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
10.93k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.32k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.96k (x1.06)
TOTAL
43.92k
30.5k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-6100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
29.02k
22.28k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
49.55k
24.91k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.3k
10.25k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.35k (x1.02)
TOTAL
94.15k
60.79k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-6100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
569 points/W
637 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
972 points/W
712 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
241 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1846 points/W
1737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3723 points/GHz
3320 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
3215 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
1272 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1009 points/GHz
1164 points/GHz
TOTAL
11871 points/GHz
8970 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4