Core i3-6006U vs i5-560M
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-560M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
20655
Core
Skylake-U
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
17.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
34.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
7.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
5.02k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.92k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
2.18k (x0.76)
TOTAL
23.48k
17.32k (x0.74)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
14.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
10.76k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
7.13k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.57k (x1.06)
TOTAL
47.46k
34.99k (x0.74)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
307 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
2250 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
683 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
5414 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4