Core i3-6006U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-U
Dali
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
30.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
76.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
8.68k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
16.03k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
3.5k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
2.76k (x0.75)
TOTAL
30.66k
30.97k (x1.01)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
21.73k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
40.56k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
9.77k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
3.96k (x0.98)
TOTAL
67.91k
76.01k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
1449 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
2704 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
651 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
5068 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
8849 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4