Celeron N4120 vs Core i5-560M
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-560M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 43.4 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 43.4 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.25k points
17.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
43.4k points
34.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.36k
7.2k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
6.98k
5.02k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.92k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.35k
2.18k (x0.93)
TOTAL
17.25k
17.32k (x1)
Multithread
N4120
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
14.53k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.86k
10.76k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.3k
7.13k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
2.57k (x0.8)
TOTAL
43.4k
34.99k (x0.81)
Performance/W
N4120
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
2340 points/W
415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3143 points/W
307 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1216 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
533 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7233 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
2061 points/GHz
2250 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2685 points/GHz
1568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
904 points/GHz
683 points/GHz
TOTAL
6635 points/GHz
5414 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4