| | | | | | |

Celeron N4120 vs J3455


Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 43.4 k points while the J3455 gets 47.4 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.1 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
506c9
Core
Gemini Lake
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.25k points
13.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
43.4k points
47.36k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4120
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
0.88k
1.71k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
3.63k
3.08k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.71k
1.97k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
2.15k (x1.6)
TOTAL
7.56k
8.91k (x1.18)

Multithread

N4120

J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2.64k
6.4k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.16k
11.59k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.58k
7.23k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
4.39k (x4.18)
TOTAL
17.43k
29.61k (x1.7)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
5.36k
6.1k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
6.98k
3.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.04k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.35k
1.98k (x0.84)
TOTAL
17.25k
13.66k (x0.79)

Multithread

N4120

J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
23.3k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
18.86k
13.38k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.3k
6.96k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.72k (x1.16)
TOTAL
43.4k
47.36k (x1.09)

Performance/W
N4120
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2340 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3143 points/W
1338 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1216 points/W
696 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
533 points/W
372 points/W
TOTAL
7233 points/W
4736 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4120
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2061 points/GHz
2652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2685 points/GHz
1545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
904 points/GHz
859 points/GHz
TOTAL
6635 points/GHz
5941 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4