Celeron N4020 vs Pentium J2900
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the J2900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J2900 is 1.4 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J2900 is 1.4 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.41 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
November 2019
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
10.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
34.35k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
5.1k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
2.45k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
1.92k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
1.17k (x0.66)
TOTAL
17.67k
10.65k (x0.6)
Multithread
N4020
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
16.65k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
9.21k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
7.24k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
1.26k (x0.66)
TOTAL
25.26k
34.35k (x1.36)
Performance/W
N4020
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
1665 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
724 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
3435 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
1913 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
721 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
439 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
3993 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4