Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs A9 9420
Description
The SU7300 is based on Core architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.6 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the SU7300 gets a score of 11.3 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 2.6 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
670f00
Core
Peryn-3M
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 956
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2009
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
6.92k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
11.27k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
SU7300
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1.48k
8.41k (x5.68)
Test#2 (FP)
3.27k
11.48k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
3.29k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.93k
2.24k (x2.41)
TOTAL
6.92k
25.41k (x3.67)
Multithread
SU7300
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.54k
11.25k (x4.42)
Test#2 (FP)
5.49k
13.69k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.09k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.13k
1.87k (x1.66)
TOTAL
11.27k
28.89k (x2.56)
Performance/W
SU7300
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
254 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
549 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
210 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
1127 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
SU7300
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1139 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
957 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
714 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
5325 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4