Core Duo T2300 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 2.3 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 2.3 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
10676
Core
Yonah
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
31 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2006
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
2.88k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
6.31k (x3.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
2.53k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.35k (x1.41)
TOTAL
5.58k
13.08k (x2.34)
Multithread
T2300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
5.45k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
11.5k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
4.02k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.05k (x1.03)
TOTAL
9.38k
22.02k (x2.35)
Performance/W
T2300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4