Core Duo T2300 vs Pentium D 925
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the 925 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.5 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.5 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
f65
Core
Yonah
Presler
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
31 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2006
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
7.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
14.03k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
2.06k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
3.32k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
1.52k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
0.8k (x0.83)
TOTAL
5.58k
7.7k (x1.38)
Multithread
T2300
925
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
4k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
6.32k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.91k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.81k (x0.8)
TOTAL
9.38k
14.03k (x1.5)
Performance/W
T2300
925
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
42 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
67 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
31 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
148 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
925
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
266 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
2565 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4