Core Duo T2300 vs Atom Z520
Description
The T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M architecture while the Z520 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the Z520 gets 3.6 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 2.6 times faster than the Z520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T2300 gets a score of 9.4 k points while the Z520 gets 3.6 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 2.6 times faster than the Z520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6e8
106c2
Core
Yonah
Silverthorne
Base frecuency
1.66 GHz
1.333 GHz
Socket
Socket 479
BGA 441
Cores/Threads
2/2
1 /2
TDP
31 W
2 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2006
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
5.58k points
2.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.38k points
3.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T2300
Z520
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
0.9k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
1.63k
0.71k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.53k
0.75k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
0.37k (x0.39)
TOTAL
5.58k
2.72k (x0.49)
Multithread
T2300
Z520
Test#1 (Integers)
2.42k
1.06k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
1.08k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
1.06k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.41k (x0.4)
TOTAL
9.38k
3.6k (x0.38)
Performance/W
T2300
Z520
Test#1 (Integers)
78 points/W
528 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
95 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97 points/W
528 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
303 points/W
1800 points/W
Performance/GHz
T2300
Z520
Test#1 (Integers)
882 points/GHz
673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
980 points/GHz
530 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
924 points/GHz
560 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
578 points/GHz
278 points/GHz
TOTAL
3364 points/GHz
2040 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4