Pentium Dual-Core E2160 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The E2160 is based on Core architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.7 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.7 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
106a5
Core
Allendale
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2007
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.87k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2160
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
4.76k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
1.88k
3.15k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.94k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
1.45k (x1.26)
TOTAL
7k
11.3k (x1.61)
Multithread
E2160
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
9.48k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
6.3k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
3.86k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
2.64k (x2.22)
TOTAL
12.87k
22.28k (x1.73)
Performance/W
E2160
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
64 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
198 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2160
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
3891 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4