Pentium Dual-Core E2160 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Description
Both models E2160 and SU7300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E2160 is 1.1 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E2160 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E2160 is 1.1 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6f2
1067a
Core
Allendale
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2007
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.87k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E2160
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.48k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
1.88k
3.27k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.24k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.16k
0.93k (x0.8)
TOTAL
7k
6.92k (x0.99)
Multithread
E2160
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
2.54k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
5.49k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
2.1k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
1.13k (x0.95)
TOTAL
12.87k
11.27k (x0.88)
Performance/W
E2160
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
64 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
58 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
58 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
198 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
E2160
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1043 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
3891 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4