Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
- W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
20.99k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
11.9k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.72k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
3.75k (x0.36)
TOTAL
58.05k
41.36k (x0.71)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
172.62k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
110.03k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
44.06k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
16.93k (x2.95)
TOTAL
210.91k
343.64k (x1.63)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)