Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
- W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
27.14k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
24.75k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.73k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
11.84k (x1.14)
TOTAL
58.05k
69.47k (x1.2)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
105.77k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
107.47k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
24.82k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
8.02k (x1.4)
TOTAL
210.91k
246.07k (x1.17)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)