Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
14.2k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
23.23k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.35k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
5.18k (x0.5)
TOTAL
58.05k
47.96k (x0.83)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
58.24k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
105.72k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
28.73k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.59k (x0.97)
TOTAL
210.91k
198.27k (x0.94)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)