Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
90675
Core
Kaby Lake
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
- W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
33.85k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
20.33k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
10.51k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
11.77k (x1.13)
TOTAL
58.05k
76.46k (x1.32)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
174.21k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
141.31k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
64.86k (x2.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
19.01k (x3.31)
TOTAL
210.91k
399.39k (x1.89)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)