Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 512.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 512.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d0
306e4
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
12 /24
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
3.44k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
9.54k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
4.21k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
3.94k (x0.34)
TOTAL
48.01k
21.13k (x0.44)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
73.17k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
230.83k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
107.14k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
7.99k (x0.53)
TOTAL
354.57k
419.12k (x1.18)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
10.64k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
9.53k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.12k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
3.62k (x0.31)
TOTAL
64.74k
27.91k (x0.43)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
252.69k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
238.68k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
115.5k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
10.98k (x0.55)
TOTAL
551.04k
617.84k (x1.12)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
10.53k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
9.98k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
4k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
3.4k (x0.3)
TOTAL
66.74k
27.92k (x0.42)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
247.05k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
264.43k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
111.01k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
10.66k (x0.67)
TOTAL
512.94k
633.14k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3211 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5409 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
11399 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5550 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2731 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2479 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
14509 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4