| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
35840 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
17.8k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
16.51k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.47k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
2.56k (x0.22)
TOTAL
81.62k
41.35k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
494.82k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
514.13k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
132.87k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
20.8k (x1.03)
TOTAL
709.85k
1162.63k (x1.64)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4