| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 512.9 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
306e4
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
10 /20
TDP
45 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
25600 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
11.96k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
10.73k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.59k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
4.31k (x0.37)
TOTAL
64.74k
31.6k (x0.49)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
218.24k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
206.92k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
100.37k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
11.45k (x0.57)
TOTAL
551.04k
536.99k (x0.97)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
10.55k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
10.02k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
3.99k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
3.66k (x0.32)
TOTAL
66.74k
28.23k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
215.04k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
230.43k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
96.87k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
8.76k (x0.55)
TOTAL
512.94k
551.1k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3211 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5409 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
11399 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5550 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2731 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2479 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
14509 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4