| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
3.52k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
8.68k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
2.83k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
3.13k (x0.27)
TOTAL
48.01k
18.17k (x0.38)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
32.7k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
105.18k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
35.18k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
9.54k (x0.64)
TOTAL
354.57k
182.59k (x0.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
11.08k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
9.57k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
3.18k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
3.28k (x0.28)
TOTAL
64.74k
27.11k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
139.07k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
133.47k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
46.6k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
6.65k (x0.33)
TOTAL
551.04k
325.78k (x0.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
11.18k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
10.06k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
3.21k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
3.12k (x0.27)
TOTAL
66.74k
27.57k (x0.41)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
140.98k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
145.37k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
45.62k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
6.75k (x0.42)
TOTAL
512.94k
338.73k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
18.62k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
10.49k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.04k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
3.26k (x0.28)
TOTAL
81.62k
36.41k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
236.25k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
151.05k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
58.9k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
6.7k (x0.33)
TOTAL
709.85k
452.9k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4