| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
13.1k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
11.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
4.83k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
3.83k (x0.34)
TOTAL
66.74k
33.68k (x0.5)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
105.42k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
109.99k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
44.56k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
17.7k (x1.11)
TOTAL
512.94k
277.66k (x0.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
20.99k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
11.9k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.72k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
3.75k (x0.32)
TOTAL
81.62k
41.36k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
172.62k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
110.03k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
44.06k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
16.93k (x0.84)
TOTAL
709.85k
343.64k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4