| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 512.9 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the E5-1660 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
12.41k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
17.23k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
4.89k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
3.07k (x0.27)
TOTAL
66.74k
37.6k (x0.56)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
102.11k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
156.5k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
42.08k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
19.8k (x1.24)
TOTAL
512.94k
320.49k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3211 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5409 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
11399 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5550 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2731 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2479 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
14509 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4