| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i9-14900K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 2.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
b0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
1756.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
63.55k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
32.3k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
18.92k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
22.61k (x1.93)
TOTAL
81.62k
137.37k (x1.68)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
813.87k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
608.32k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
313.09k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
21.31k (x1.06)
TOTAL
709.85k
1756.59k (x2.47)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
14053 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4