| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i9-10940X


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
50657
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
19712 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
1088.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
29.75k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
27.44k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.81k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
9.05k (x0.77)
TOTAL
81.62k
72.04k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
485.37k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
472.7k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
113.09k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
16.95k (x0.84)
TOTAL
709.85k
1088.11k (x1.53)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
6595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4