| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i9-10900K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
19.5k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
28.01k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
7.45k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
15.82k (x1.36)
TOTAL
64.74k
70.79k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
194.49k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
312.59k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
89.14k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
12.58k (x0.63)
TOTAL
551.04k
608.81k (x1.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
32.67k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
28.49k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
6.53k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
12.72k (x1.08)
TOTAL
81.62k
80.41k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
307.39k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
298.47k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
72.94k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
6.85k (x0.34)
TOTAL
709.85k
685.65k (x0.97)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4