| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i7-10700


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16386 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
537.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
30.66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
25.64k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.98k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
12.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
81.62k
74.53k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
240.28k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
234.3k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
56.12k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
7.02k (x0.35)
TOTAL
709.85k
537.73k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
8273 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4