| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-9600K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.9 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
906ed
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
9216 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
77.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
372.74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.69k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
19.35k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
6.08k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
13.81k (x1.18)
TOTAL
48.01k
43.93k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
26.24k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
107.95k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
34.5k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
8.1k (x0.54)
TOTAL
354.57k
176.79k (x0.5)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.91k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
24.42k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
6.37k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
13.55k (x1.16)
TOTAL
64.74k
61.25k (x0.95)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
95.21k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
137.3k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
36.05k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
8.4k (x0.42)
TOTAL
551.04k
276.96k (x0.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
16.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
25.5k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
6.17k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
13.06k (x1.15)
TOTAL
66.74k
61.48k (x0.92)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
96.03k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
143.78k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
35.06k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
8.45k (x0.53)
TOTAL
512.94k
283.33k (x0.55)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
30.64k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
26.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
6.33k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
14.03k (x1.19)
TOTAL
81.62k
77.75k (x0.95)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
174.92k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
153.88k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
35.93k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
8k (x0.4)
TOTAL
709.85k
372.74k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
1620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
378 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
3924 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6661 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
16902 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4