| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-6600K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-6600K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 512.9 k points while the i5-6600K gets 209.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.5 times faster than the i5-6600K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
506e3
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2021
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
59.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
209.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
17.24k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
26.5k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
6.45k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
9.09k (x0.8)
TOTAL
66.74k
59.28k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
68.47k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
105.05k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
25.24k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
10.5k (x0.66)
TOTAL
512.94k
209.28k (x0.41)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3211 points/W
721 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5409 points/W
1106 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/W
266 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
11399 points/W
2203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
4420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5550 points/GHz
6795 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2731 points/GHz
1653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2479 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
14509 points/GHz
15199 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4