| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-10400T


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
14.19k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
4.62k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
11.03k (x0.95)
TOTAL
48.01k
33.84k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
22.77k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
96.59k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
31.65k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
2.45k (x0.16)
TOTAL
354.57k
153.46k (x0.43)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
12.61k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
17.94k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.83k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
10.81k (x0.93)
TOTAL
64.74k
46.19k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
74.62k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
119.63k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
32.65k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
2.52k (x0.13)
TOTAL
551.04k
229.42k (x0.42)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
12.5k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
19.05k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
4.72k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
10.3k (x0.9)
TOTAL
66.74k
46.57k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
74.58k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
126.96k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
31.76k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
2.5k (x0.16)
TOTAL
512.94k
235.8k (x0.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
22k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
19.98k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
4.57k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
11.31k (x0.96)
TOTAL
81.62k
57.85k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
136.69k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
135.25k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
32.76k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
2.48k (x0.12)
TOTAL
709.85k
307.18k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4