| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.3k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
16.56k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
5.25k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
12.61k (x1.08)
TOTAL
48.01k
38.72k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
18.1k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
79.16k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
26.75k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
13.81k (x0.92)
TOTAL
354.57k
137.82k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
26.28k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
23.38k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.52k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
12.96k (x1.1)
TOTAL
81.62k
68.14k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
163.67k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
159.74k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
39k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
7.56k (x0.38)
TOTAL
709.85k
369.97k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4