| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-10300H


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2.9 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
15.65k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
23.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
5.66k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
11.43k (x1)
TOTAL
66.74k
55.87k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
26.77k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
43.81k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
10.17k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
11.91k (x0.74)
TOTAL
512.94k
92.66k (x0.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
27.14k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
24.75k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.73k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
11.84k (x1.01)
TOTAL
81.62k
69.47k (x0.85)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
105.77k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
107.47k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
24.82k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
8.02k (x0.4)
TOTAL
709.85k
246.07k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4