| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a20f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
1080.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
22.91k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
26.24k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
11.87k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
26.28k (x2.24)
TOTAL
81.62k
87.3k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
359.17k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
479.04k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
214.59k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
28.16k (x1.4)
TOTAL
709.85k
1080.96k (x1.52)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
10295 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4