Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d0
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.39k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
16.99k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
7.74k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
24.57k (x2.11)
TOTAL
48.01k
53.69k (x1.12)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
48.45k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
230.81k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
122.82k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
54.73k (x3.66)
TOTAL
354.57k
456.8k (x1.29)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.59k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
24.55k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
8.55k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
26.28k (x2.25)
TOTAL
64.74k
75.97k (x1.17)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
181.33k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
261.01k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
126.62k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
66.64k (x3.33)
TOTAL
551.04k
635.6k (x1.15)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
16.16k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
23.75k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
9.32k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
23.17k (x2.03)
TOTAL
66.74k
72.4k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
174.73k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
275.63k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
125.65k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
44.17k (x2.76)
TOTAL
512.94k
620.18k (x1.21)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
16.85k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
26.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
9.54k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
22.55k (x1.92)
TOTAL
81.62k
74.97k (x0.92)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
229.41k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
292.81k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
128.48k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
36.8k (x1.83)
TOTAL
709.85k
687.5k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4