| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 7 7840HS


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a70f41
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
622.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
31.57k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
25.2k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
12.42k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
21.93k (x1.87)
TOTAL
81.62k
91.11k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
265.26k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
226.13k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
114.46k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
16.49k (x0.82)
TOTAL
709.85k
622.34k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
17781 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4