| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.7 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.31k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
17.51k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
10.53k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
23.57k (x2.02)
TOTAL
48.01k
55.92k (x1.16)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
24.18k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
117.98k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
70.96k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
8.08k (x0.54)
TOTAL
354.57k
221.19k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
20.37k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
22.52k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
10.18k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
21.49k (x1.83)
TOTAL
81.62k
74.56k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
144.01k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
191.86k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
84.53k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
6.5k (x0.32)
TOTAL
709.85k
426.9k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4