Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d0
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.25k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
19.72k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
5.84k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
21.36k (x1.83)
TOTAL
48.01k
51.17k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
35.04k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
181.42k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
64.86k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
8.21k (x0.55)
TOTAL
354.57k
289.54k (x0.82)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
15.22k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
24.12k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.87k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
21k (x1.8)
TOTAL
64.74k
66.21k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
126.81k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
229.86k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
61.74k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
9.77k (x0.49)
TOTAL
551.04k
428.19k (x0.78)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
14.44k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
24.92k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
5.8k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
19.07k (x1.67)
TOTAL
66.74k
64.24k (x0.96)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
122.01k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
220.34k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
59.89k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
9.9k (x0.62)
TOTAL
512.94k
412.13k (x0.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
15.34k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
25.75k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
5.79k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
17.95k (x1.53)
TOTAL
81.62k
64.83k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
123.07k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
239.3k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
60.6k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
8.18k (x0.41)
TOTAL
709.85k
431.14k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4