| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
4.2k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
17.36k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
7.5k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
23.79k (x2.04)
TOTAL
48.01k
52.85k (x1.1)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
22.11k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
108.04k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
56.81k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
36.39k (x2.43)
TOTAL
354.57k
223.36k (x0.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
15.38k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
21.94k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
7.97k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
24.76k (x2.12)
TOTAL
64.74k
70.05k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
96.91k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
135.12k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
70.39k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
56.43k (x2.82)
TOTAL
551.04k
358.85k (x0.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
15.04k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
20.95k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
8.57k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
21.71k (x1.9)
TOTAL
66.74k
66.27k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
94.36k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
141.73k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
69.38k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
32.72k (x2.04)
TOTAL
512.94k
338.19k (x0.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
16.04k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
24.47k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
8.38k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
21.66k (x1.85)
TOTAL
81.62k
70.55k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
113.63k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
143.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
63.84k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
27.34k (x1.36)
TOTAL
709.85k
348.35k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4