| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i9-13900K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.5 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
b0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
9.77k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
24.52k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
17.17k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
21.37k (x1.83)
TOTAL
48.01k
72.83k (x1.52)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
145.21k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
444.95k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
318.3k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
27.2k (x1.82)
TOTAL
354.57k
935.66k (x2.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
31.93k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
31.54k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
18.8k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
20.82k (x1.78)
TOTAL
64.74k
103.09k (x1.59)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
522.07k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
584.17k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
344.38k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
25.36k (x1.27)
TOTAL
551.04k
1475.97k (x2.68)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
31.8k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
32.83k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
18.37k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
21.13k (x1.85)
TOTAL
66.74k
104.13k (x1.56)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
532.97k (x3.69)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
596.78k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
342.96k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
28.6k (x1.79)
TOTAL
512.94k
1501.31k (x2.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
58.6k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
33.29k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
17.77k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
19.49k (x1.66)
TOTAL
81.62k
129.15k (x1.58)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
804.04k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
613.45k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
311.08k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
34.5k (x1.71)
TOTAL
709.85k
1763.08k (x2.48)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4