| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-12600K


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12600K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-12600K gets 764.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12600K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
90672
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
111.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
764.68k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
52.6k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
27.28k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
14.86k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
16.4k (x1.4)
TOTAL
81.62k
111.14k (x1.36)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
356.58k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
263.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
126.87k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
18.08k (x0.9)
TOTAL
709.85k
764.68k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
5486 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4048 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
11764 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
10735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
3033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3346 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
22682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4