| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
90672
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
512.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
37.79k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
24.07k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
12.44k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
13.71k (x1.17)
TOTAL
81.62k
88.01k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
212.6k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
197.81k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
84.35k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
17.48k (x0.87)
TOTAL
709.85k
512.23k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
7881 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4